State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Koss

         BAR DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

          Tracy Pierce Nester, Assistant General Counsel of the Oklahoma Bar Association, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Complainant.

          Theodore Koss, Jr., pro se.

          WINCHESTER, J.

         ¶0 The Oklahoma Bar Association commenced disciplinary proceedings against Theodore Koss, Jr. The Professional Responsibility Tribunal found by clear and convincing evidence that Koss committed professional misconduct in failing to give competent representation, failing to communicate with his client, and mishandling settlement funds belonging to his client. The Tribunal also considered Koss's disciplinary history and recommended this Court suspend Koss from the practice of law for two years and one day.

         ¶1 After an investigation into a client's grievance, Complainant Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) filed its complaint against Respondent Theodore Koss, Jr. pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings. ^[1] The Professional Responsibility Tribunal (Trial Panel) heard this disciplinary matter and found Koss violated the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct (ORPC) ^[2] and the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP) in failing to give competent representation, failing to communicate with his client, and mishandling settlement funds belonging to his client. The Trial Panel considered Koss's disciplinary history and recommended this Court suspend Koss from the practice of law for two years and one day.

         I. FACTS

         Fredy Escobar Grievance

         ¶2 In 1985, Koss received his license to practice law in Oklahoma. In 2016, Fredy Escobar hired Koss to represent him in a pending workers' compensation matter. Escobar sustained a tibial pilon fracture to his left ankle, while in the course of his employment with Cesar Garcia d/b/a Garcia's Construction. The workers' compensation case settled for $9, 000. At some point during the pendency of the case, Escobar was incarcerated at the Great Plains Correctional Facility in Hinton, Oklahoma. Koss visited Escobar in the correctional facility to discuss the settlement. Escobar spoke Spanish, and Koss utilized Cesar Garcia--Escobar's employer and adverse party in the workers' compensation case--as a translator during this meeting.

         ¶3 Koss testified in front of the Trial Panel that during this meeting, Garcia told him that Escobar agreed to the following division of settlement funds: $1, 800 to Koss, which was 20% of the settlement as approved by the workers' compensation court; $200 to Koss for travel expenses; $3, 000 to Garcia for the repayment of a loan; and the remaining $4, 000 to Escobar. Koss further testified that the agreement regarding the division of the settlement funds was in writing and signed by Escobar. However, Koss could not locate the signed document reflecting this agreement during the OBA's investigation.

         ¶4 Escobar testified and denied he had an outstanding loan with Garcia. Escobar also denied that he agreed to pay $3, 000 to Garcia. Instead, Escobar testified that during the meeting, he agreed to pay $300 to Garcia for translating and travel expenses and to pay $2, 000 to Koss. It was his understanding that Koss was to pay him the remaining settlement funds of $6, 700. Escobar further testified he never signed a written document regarding the division of the settlement funds.

         ¶5 Shortly after the meeting at the correctional facility, Koss sent Garcia to retrieve the $9, 000 settlement check--payable to Koss and Escobar--from the insurance carrier. Koss directed Garcia to obtain the endorsement of Escobar on the settlement check. Garcia visited Escobar at the correctional facility, obtained Escobar's signature on the settlement check, and returned the settlement check to Koss. Koss deposited the check into his trust account and issued three checks: (1) a check in the amount of $4, 000, made payable to Escobar; (2) a check in the amount of $3, 000, made payable to Garcia; and (3) a check in the amount of $2, 000, made payable to Koss.

         ¶6 Koss mailed the check in the amount of $4, 000 to Escobar at the correctional facility. However, the correctional facility returned the settlement check to Koss, marked undeliverable. Koss did not communicate with Escobar after the correctional facility returned the check, despite receiving inquiries from Escobar as to the status of the settlement funds. Koss also did not inquire with the correctional facility as to why the settlement check was undeliverable or how to properly transmit the settlement funds to Escobar. Instead, Koss gave Escobar's settlement check to Garcia. Escobar never received any portion of the settlement funds. Escobar testified he never authorized Garcia to accept settlement funds on his behalf. Garcia did not cooperate with the OBA during its investigation.

         Enhancement

         ¶7 The Professional Responsibility Commission previously disciplined Koss for misconduct on two occasions. On January 23, 1998, the Commission privately reprimanded Koss for failing to timely refile a personal injury suit after the case had previously been filed and dismissed. On September 28, 2007, the Commission again privately reprimanded Koss for defaulting on an application to assess costs and fees against his client in a post-divorce child support matter. A district court entered a default order against Koss's client, and Koss failed to notify his client of the adverse judgment.

         Allegations Deemed Admitted

         ¶8 Escobar filed a grievance against Koss, and the OBA began an investigation. Koss delayed responding to the grievance and meeting with the OBA to discuss the grievance. Koss also failed to produce documents requested by the OBA. Due to his lack of cooperation during the investigation, the OBA subpoenaed Koss for deposition. Koss again failed to produce all the requested documents at his deposition. On January 15, 2019, the OBA filed a Complaint against Koss setting forth one count of professional misconduct and one count of enhancement due to Koss's disciplinary history. On January 23, 2019, the OBA filed an Amended Complaint, which corrected Koss's official roster address.

         ¶9 The OBA submitted evidence that it properly served Koss with notice of the Amended Complaint. Koss did not file an answer to the Amended Complaint, and on March 5, 2019, the OBA filed a Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted pursuant to RGDP Rule 6. Koss did not respond to the motion. At the hearing in front of the Trial Panel, Koss did not object to the motion, and the allegations contained in the Amended Complaint were deemed admitted. The Trial Panel proceeded to hear evidence to determine only the discipline to impose on Koss.

         ¶10 During the hearing, Koss admitted he lacked judgment in not delivering the settlement check himself or determining the procedures at the correctional institution for transmitting the settlement funds to Escobar. The Trial Panel found Koss committed professional misconduct in violation of ORPC Rules 1.1, ^[3] 1.3, ^[4] 1.4, ^[5] 1.15, ^[6] and 8.4, ^[7] as well as a violation of RGDP Rule 1.3. ^[8]

         ¶11 Regarding discipline enhancement, the Trial Panel found Koss had a disciplinary history as the Commission privately reprimanded him on two occasions. The Trial Panel recommended this Court suspend Koss from the practice of law ...